<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for TV Cameraman.info</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tvcameraman.info/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tvcameraman.info</link>
	<description>Website and Blog for TV Cameramen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:35:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sony NEX-FS700. 4K and Hi-Speed in a FS100 style body. by alisterchapman</title>
		<link>http://www.tvcameraman.info/2012/04/sony-nex-fs700-4k-and-hi-speed-in-a-fs100-style-body/#comment-5528</link>
		<dc:creator>alisterchapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xdcam-user.com/?p=1804#comment-5528</guid>
		<description>If anything, if your primary format is 1920 x 1080, on paper at least the FS100 should be the better camera, provide you happy to use HDMI for the output. The FS-700 has much smaller pixels and a lot more of them. This normally means more noise and reduced sensitivity. We&#039;ll have to wait and see what happens in the real world.

These days new cameras come out every year. So you have to be sure that the one you choose will provide what you need and then just be prepared for an updated model to come along fairly soon. I wouldn&#039;t get too hung up on not having the latest and greatest as other than the trend towards larger sensors, overall image quality has only increased by quite small increments over the last 3 or 4 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anything, if your primary format is 1920 x 1080, on paper at least the FS100 should be the better camera, provide you happy to use HDMI for the output. The FS-700 has much smaller pixels and a lot more of them. This normally means more noise and reduced sensitivity. We&#8217;ll have to wait and see what happens in the real world.</p>
<p>These days new cameras come out every year. So you have to be sure that the one you choose will provide what you need and then just be prepared for an updated model to come along fairly soon. I wouldn&#8217;t get too hung up on not having the latest and greatest as other than the trend towards larger sensors, overall image quality has only increased by quite small increments over the last 3 or 4 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sony NEX-FS700. 4K and Hi-Speed in a FS100 style body. by alisterchapman</title>
		<link>http://www.tvcameraman.info/2012/04/sony-nex-fs700-4k-and-hi-speed-in-a-fs100-style-body/#comment-5527</link>
		<dc:creator>alisterchapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xdcam-user.com/?p=1804#comment-5527</guid>
		<description>An update on the output is that it&#039;s 8 bit 3G. So even at 1920 x 1080 it will only be an 8 bit output, but it would appear that it is 4:2:2. Certainly the HDMI out is 4:2:2 and goes up to 60fps at 1920 x 1080.

I&#039;ve placed an order for one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An update on the output is that it&#8217;s 8 bit 3G. So even at 1920 x 1080 it will only be an 8 bit output, but it would appear that it is 4:2:2. Certainly the HDMI out is 4:2:2 and goes up to 60fps at 1920 x 1080.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve placed an order for one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sony NEX-FS700. 4K and Hi-Speed in a FS100 style body. by sampro</title>
		<link>http://www.tvcameraman.info/2012/04/sony-nex-fs700-4k-and-hi-speed-in-a-fs100-style-body/#comment-5526</link>
		<dc:creator>sampro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 20:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xdcam-user.com/?p=1804#comment-5526</guid>
		<description>My FS-100 arrived  just less than a month ago, i don&#039;t need 4K but i do need ND filters (got the Heliopan ND)....it is the second time that i buy a camera from Sony and after one or two month a better one arrive..well, i&#039;m happy with my choice because i won&#039;t be paying € 3,000 more just to have nd filters.
If there will be a difference in image quality...that would hurt!!!
Alister,waiting for your review about the FS700 and maybe some comparison between FS700 and FS100 image quality.
thanks
Samer Aslan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My FS-100 arrived  just less than a month ago, i don&#8217;t need 4K but i do need ND filters (got the Heliopan ND)&#8230;.it is the second time that i buy a camera from Sony and after one or two month a better one arrive..well, i&#8217;m happy with my choice because i won&#8217;t be paying € 3,000 more just to have nd filters.<br />
If there will be a difference in image quality&#8230;that would hurt!!!<br />
Alister,waiting for your review about the FS700 and maybe some comparison between FS700 and FS100 image quality.<br />
thanks<br />
Samer Aslan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sony NEX-FS700. 4K and Hi-Speed in a FS100 style body. by dennisphoto</title>
		<link>http://www.tvcameraman.info/2012/04/sony-nex-fs700-4k-and-hi-speed-in-a-fs100-style-body/#comment-5524</link>
		<dc:creator>dennisphoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 10:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xdcam-user.com/?p=1804#comment-5524</guid>
		<description>Yes, very interesting indeed. Looking forward to your hands-on NAB report to find out what signals are coming out of the back when not shooting 4K. Lets hope they still support 4:2:2 when shooting 1920x1080.(as the FS100) But maybe this time at 10 bits?

best regards
Dennis Ersöz</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, very interesting indeed. Looking forward to your hands-on NAB report to find out what signals are coming out of the back when not shooting 4K. Lets hope they still support 4:2:2 when shooting 1920&#215;1080.(as the FS100) But maybe this time at 10 bits?</p>
<p>best regards<br />
Dennis Ersöz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Real Time Aurora video shot with PMW-F3 by alisterchapman</title>
		<link>http://www.tvcameraman.info/2012/01/real-time-aurora-video-shot-with-pmw-f3/#comment-5468</link>
		<dc:creator>alisterchapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 21:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xdcam-user.com/?p=1641#comment-5468</guid>
		<description>YouTube Germany has different rules regarding what can be viewed compared to other countries, although I don&#039;t know why this should be blocked as all the rights are cleared. Try the vimeo version: https://vimeo.com/36335390</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YouTube Germany has different rules regarding what can be viewed compared to other countries, although I don&#8217;t know why this should be blocked as all the rights are cleared. Try the vimeo version: <a href="https://vimeo.com/36335390" rel="nofollow">https://vimeo.com/36335390</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Set of Canon C300 Custom Profiles for Download. by TV Cameraman.info: Set of Canon C300 Custom Profiles for Download &#124; Kelly On A Tangent</title>
		<link>http://www.tvcameraman.info/2012/03/set-of-canon-c300-custom-profiles-for-download/#comment-5382</link>
		<dc:creator>TV Cameraman.info: Set of Canon C300 Custom Profiles for Download &#124; Kelly On A Tangent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 07:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xdcam-user.com/?p=1736#comment-5382</guid>
		<description>[...] Set of Canon C300 Custom Profiles for Download. » TV Cameraman.info. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Set of Canon C300 Custom Profiles for Download. » TV Cameraman.info. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Real Time Aurora video shot with PMW-F3 by Amber Newton</title>
		<link>http://www.tvcameraman.info/2012/01/real-time-aurora-video-shot-with-pmw-f3/#comment-5467</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber Newton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xdcam-user.com/?p=1641#comment-5467</guid>
		<description>I am sorry but I can&#039;t open the video. It says the video is not available in Germany. I am not in Germany. What&#039;s wrong with it? I really want to watch the video.
http://9pillsonline.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry but I can&#8217;t open the video. It says the video is not available in Germany. I am not in Germany. What&#8217;s wrong with it? I really want to watch the video.<br />
<a href="http://9pillsonline.com/" rel="nofollow">http://9pillsonline.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Moto GP shoot with Alexa, F3&#8242;s and C300&#8242;s by Philip Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.tvcameraman.info/2012/03/moto-gp-shoot-with-alexa-f3s-and-c300s/#comment-5523</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 22:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xdcam-user.com/?p=1798#comment-5523</guid>
		<description>Hi Alister, I also agree the C300 mic holder is a pain in the butt, last night I got to work producing an alternative you can see my results here...

http://www.hdwarrior.co.uk/2012/03/29/filming-a-web-commercial-with-the-canon-c300/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alister, I also agree the C300 mic holder is a pain in the butt, last night I got to work producing an alternative you can see my results here&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hdwarrior.co.uk/2012/03/29/filming-a-web-commercial-with-the-canon-c300/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hdwarrior.co.uk/2012/03/29/filming-a-web-commercial-with-the-canon-c300/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Week With The Canon C300. by Robert Ruffo</title>
		<link>http://www.tvcameraman.info/2012/03/a-week-with-the-canon-c300/#comment-5504</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Ruffo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xdcam-user.com/?p=1744#comment-5504</guid>
		<description>Whereas I find your study of this and other cameras most helpful and well written, You seem to pretend that Red&#039;s products don&#039;t even exist as options.  Why is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whereas I find your study of this and other cameras most helpful and well written, You seem to pretend that Red&#8217;s products don&#8217;t even exist as options.  Why is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stetting up video cameras without charts. by alisterchapman</title>
		<link>http://www.tvcameraman.info/2009/08/stetting-up-video-cameras-without-charts/#comment-5445</link>
		<dc:creator>alisterchapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 18:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xdcam-user.com/?p=152#comment-5445</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s just a photo of a local street, nothing special.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just a photo of a local street, nothing special.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

