When should I use a Cinegamma or Hypergamma?
Cinegammas are designed to be graded. The shape of the curve with steadily increasing compression from around 65-70% upwards tends to lead to a flat looking image, but maximises the cameras latitude (although similar can be achieved with a standard gamma and careful knee setting). The beauty of the cinegammas is that the gentle onset of the highlight compression means that grading will be able to extract a more natural image from the highlights. Note than Cinegamma 2 is broadcast safe and has slightly reduced lattitude than CG 1,3 and 4.
Standard gammas will give a more natural looking picture right up to the point where the knee kicks in. From there up the signal is heavily compressed, so trying to extract subtle textures from highlights in post is difficult. The issue with standard gammas and the knee is that the image is either heavily compressed or not, there’s no middle ground.
In a perfect world you would control your lighting (turning down the sun if necessary ;-o) so that you could use standard gamma 3 (ITU 709 standard HD gamma) with no knee. Everything would be linear and nothing blown out. This would equate to a roughly 7 stop range. This nice linear signal would grade very well and give you a fantastic result. Careful use of graduated filters or studio lighting might still allow you to do this, but the real world is rarely restricted to a 7 stop brightness range. So we must use the knee or Cinegamma to prevent our highlights from looking ugly.
If you are committed to a workflow that will include grading, then Cinegammas are best. If you use them be very careful with your exposure, you don’t want to overexpose, especially where faces are involved. getting the exposure just right with cinegammas is harder than with standard gammas. If anything err on the side of caution and come down 1/2 a stop.
If your workflow might not include grading then stick to the standard gammas. They are a little more tolerant of slight over exposure because skin and foliage won’t get compressed until it gets up to the 80% mark (depending on your knee setting). Plus the image looks nicer straight out of the camera as the cameras gamma should be a close match to the monitors gamma.
4 Comments to When should I use a Cinegamma or Hypergamma?
Leave a Reply
Search TVCameraman.info
Most Recent Posts
- Official European List Pricing for the F5/F55 released, very attractive!
- Why it’s almost impossible to have true Par-Focal zooms on the cheaper 35mm camcorders.
- PMW-200 Firmware V1.1 Update. Helps Fix Back Focus Issues.
- Strokkur: An Icelandic Geyser in Super Slow Motion.
- Workshops in New York and Austin, Texas.
- Raw is raw, but not all raw is created equal.
- Sony F5 and F55 pricing released, by mistake!
- My Horizon Factual Short Film Contest. 1st Prize: Sony NXCAM Camcorder!
Site Pages
- A to Z Index
- About
- Alister's Bio and Info
- Alister's Blog
- Alister’s Bio and Info
- Alister’s Blog
- Camera Setup
- Contact Me
- Documentary Production Workshops
- Example Video Clips
- Film Competition
- How To Videos
- Northern Lights Live 2012
- Once in a Lifetime Northern lights Expeditions to Norway.
- Picture Profile Guide.
- Reviews
- Adaptimax Lens Adapters for PMW-F3
- Alister’s Equipment Reviews A to Z.
- Alphatron EVF-035W Viewfinder Video Review.
- Atomos Samurai
- Camrade cb-single-iii camera bag.
- CamRade WS PMW F3 Rain Cover Review.
- Cineroid HDSDI EVF (EVF-4MSS) review.
- Juice Designs EX1R Baseplate.
- Manfrotto 509 Tripod Head
- NEX-FS700 In Depth Review.
- Review of the Sony PMW-200
- Sonnet QIO Review. Very, Very, Fast Offloads.
- Sonnet SDHC to SxS Camera Adapter.
- Sony FS100 and F3 Video Review
- Sony NEX-EA50 Review.
- Sony PVM-740 OLED monitor
- Tilta BS-TS03 Shoulder Mount Review
- Today3D FIZ controller. Focus, Zoom, Iris, Interaxial.
- Transvideo PMW-F3 replacement base assembly.
- Triad PL to E-Mount adapter.
- TVLogic WFM-056WP Monitor/Viewfinder
- Vinten 100 Tripod Review
- Zunow SWV-E11 11-16mm E-Mount F2.8 Zoom Lens.
- Shooting Tips
- Short Film Workshop
- Tech Notes.
- Tornado Chasing
- Training and Expeditions
- Ultimate Documentary Production Workshop
- Video Reviews
- Welcome
- Workshops and Training
Recent Comments
- alisterchapman on NEX-FS700 In Depth Review.
- alisterchapman on Uncompressed 240 fps possible with FS700 and Convergent Design Gemini. Tested!
- alisterchapman on Vinten Vision 100 Long Term Review.
- alisterchapman on Strokkur: An Icelandic Geyser in Super Slow Motion.
- alisterchapman on EX1 and EX3 Picture Profiles.


Hello Mr. Chapman, I will film a Jet Ski competion with PMW350. What settings should I use to get the best image. Thank you for your help. Alin
What is the difference between Cinegamma & Hypergamma?
If there is no difference, please say so!
If there is a difference, please explain!
John
Cinegammas and hypergammas are basically the same kind of thing. They achieve a greater latitude by compressing highlights by increasing amounts. Cinegamma 1 is the same as Hypergamma 4 and Cinegamma 2 is the same as Hypergamma 2.
CG1/HG4 takes a 460% input range and compresses it in to 109% and CG2/HG2 takes a 460% input range and compresses it in to 100% broadcast safe range.
[...] http://www.xdcam-user.com/2011/01/when-should-i-use-a-cinegamma-or-hypergamma [...]